Publications

R. v. Montour: a drastic shift in Indigenous rights jurisprudence

On November 1, the Honourable Sophie Bourque of the Superior Court of Québec handed down a decision that will have a huge impact on Indigenous law in the case of R. c. Montour. This decision marks a major paradigm shift in how the relationship between the Crown and Indigenous peoples is conceived; it has also upset Canada’s constitutional order.

Our team has put together an overview of several important matters addressed in this decision.

Continue reading

Constructive dismissal: the Court of Appeal weighs in

On May 18, 2023, in Lareau c. Centre du camion Gamache inc., the Court of Appeal of Quebec issued a decision of particular interest regarding the concept of constructive dismissal, clarifying the circumstances that constitute constructive dismissal and calculation of any compensation due, if any.

Continue reading

The “belt and braces” approach: The Supreme Court of Canada strengthens occupational health and safety obligations

On November 10, the country’s highest court issued an interesting decision on employers’ health and safety obligations in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City), 2023 SCC 28. The decision reaffirms that occupational health and safety (OHS) is everyone’s responsibility and that an employer can be held liable for an OHS violation even if it is not the fault of one of its own employees.

This decision is of interest to owners that hire general contractors to manage projects.

Continue reading

Tis the season to be jolly – Office holiday party season, that is!

Office holiday parties are a wonderful time for employers to highlight employees’ accomplishments, thank them for their contributions to the company and give them a chance to mix and mingle in a more relaxed setting.

Here are a few reminders to help prevent unfortunate incidents and ensure that these events go off without a hitch. 

Continue reading

Is an insurer obliged to defend its insured for all damages claimed, even if certain types of damages are excluded from the policy?

When an insured claims compensation, the mere possibility that the claim falls within the scope of the policy triggers an obligation, on the part of the insurer, to defend the insured in a litigation dispute.1 However, some claims may involve damages that are not covered, while others are. In this specific case, must the insurer assume the defence costs associated with all claimed items, or can it exclude those incurred for non-covered damages?

Continue reading