Marie-Pier Auger
Lawyer - Quebec City
Marie-Pier Auger is a lawyer in the Quebec City office of Langlois lawyers. She practises primarily in the areas of insurance law and civil and professional liability.
Marie-Pier joined the firm as a student in the summer of 2016 and completed her articles there in 2017. Her interest in public relations led her to obtain a bachelor’s degree in public communications while studying for her law degree.
She carries on her practice in both English and French.
Education
LL.B., Civil Law, Laval University, 2016
B.A., Public Communications, Laval University, 2016
College diploma in paralegal studies, Collège François-Xavier-Garneau, Quebec City, 2012
Areas of Practice
Industries
Publications
Articles
News
Other Publications
2020 – “Commentaire sur la décision Kosoian c. Société de transport de Montréal – Les limites du pouvoir coercitif des policiers” (Case comment on Kosoian v. Société de transport de Montréal – The limits of the coercive power of police officers), Éditions Yvon Blais, Montréal, February 2020, EYB2020REP2905
2019 – “Commentaire sur la décision Gauthier c. Procureure générale du Québec – Poursuite pour agression sexuelle : qu’en est-il des répercussions post-acquittement?” (Case comment on Gauthier v. Procureure générale du Québec – Prosecution for sexual assault: How do matters stand on post-acquittal repercussions?), Éditions Yvon Blais, Montréal, May 2019, EYB2019REP2756
2019 – “Commentaire sur la décision Industrielle Alliance, assurances auto et habitation inc. c. J. Noël Francoeur inc. – L’exonération de l’entrepreneur en vertu de la Loi sur la sécurité incendie” (Case comment on Industrielle Alliance, assurances auto et habitation inc. v. J. Noël Francoeur inc. – The contractor’s exemption under the Fire Safety Act), Éditions Yvon Blais, Montréal, February 2019, EYB2019REP2675
2018 – “Commentaire sur la décision Office municipal d’habitation Kativik c. WSP Canada Inc. – Peut-on retenir les services de l’expert de la partie adverse ?” (Case comment on Office municipal d’habitation Kativik v. WSP Canada Inc. – Can a party retain the services of the other party’s expert?) , co-author Samuel Gagnon, Repères, Éditions Yvon Blais, Montréal, September 2018, EYB2018REP2538
2018 – Participation in preparation of the article “Chronique – Le privilège d’intérêt commun et la reconnaissance de ce privilège par les tribunaux québécois et canadiens” (The common interest privilege and its recognition by Quebec and Canadian courts), Catherine Bourget and Charles Lapointe, Repères, Yvon Blais, May 2018, EYB2018REP2471
Top of the page